David Consigli, Jr. is a Certified Public Accountant and Partner at Ferraro, Amodio and Zarecki, CPAs. David has an Accreditation in Business Valuation and is a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst. David practices a philosophy built around providing clients with outstanding creative and personalized quality services. David's experience and expertise help him provide clients with the tools and resources they need to understand the valuation of closely-held businesses, especially when it comes to divorce. His strengths in communicating the results of his valuation conclusion to clients are qualities that make him a leader in the industry.
Host: David Consigli, CPA/ABV, CDFA, Partner and Lead, FAZ CPAs Business Valuation Practice
Guest(s): Attorney Kathleen P. Ryder, managing partner of Ryder and Phelps, P.C.
This webinar explores key considerations for attorneys and advisors when engaging a business valuation expert, with a focus on experience, credentials, and specialization. It also highlights real-world insights from a valuation professional on navigating complex matters like divorce, litigation, and making strategic career decisions in a niche practice.
In many legal matters — such as shareholder disputesanddivorce cases — business valuation experts play a critical role in determining the value of privately held companies. While some cases evolve into prolonged and costly litigation, there are scenarios where both parties can agree to jointly retain a single business valuation expert. This approach can offer significant advantages to the parties, their counsel, and the court. Below are five key reasons why engaging a joint business appraiser can be beneficial in litigation:
1. Cost Savings
The most obvious advantage of hiring a single expert is cost. Retaining two separate valuation experts typically doubles the fees for professional services. If the case extends over time or proceeds to trial, any necessary updates or revisions to the valuation report will also be less expensive with only one expert involved.
Additionally, attorney fees may be reduced because there is less time spent coordinating, exchanging information, and debating between two opposing experts.
2. Neutrality and Independence
All recognized business valuation credentials (such as ABV, ASA, or CVA) require appraisers to maintain independence and objectivity. When multiple experts are retained, each may act independently — but they often receive different information from the parties. This may happen unintentionally, as business owners sometimes feel threatened or hesitant to share information with an opposing expert.
With a single joint appraiser, both parties provide information to the same neutral professional, eliminating concerns about selective disclosure and reducing client pressure to “get a certain result.”
3. Increased Efficiency
Valuation engagements often depend on the availability of multiple stakeholders — experts, attorneys, clients, and sometimes third parties. When there is only one expert to coordinate with, the engagement timeline can be shortened significantly. Scheduling is simplified, document requests are centralized, and the likelihood of completing the project in a timely and organized manner increases.
4. Better Collaboration and Understanding
In many alternative dispute resolution settings, engaging one financial expert is standard practice. In a joint valuation engagement, the appraiser has the opportunity to explain valuation methods and subjective vs. non-subjective decisions to both parties and their counsel. This transparency fosters understanding, reduces unnecessary disputes, and allows for meaningful discussions around the valuation conclusions.
5. Value Beyond the Final Number
A joint appraiser can often contribute beyond simply delivering a valuation conclusion. They can run “what-if” scenarios, assist in structuring settlements, and help manage both parties’ expectations. This broader involvement can lead to more creative and practical resolutions, particularly in complex shareholder or marital cases.
Conclusion
Litigation is inherently complex and often contentious. Hiring a joint business valuation expert can help simplify the process, reduce costs, and improve the quality of information and decision-making. It is essential, however, to select a qualified and experienced valuation professional who is accustomed to working in joint expert roles and understands the nuances of litigation and dispute resolution.
In performing a business valuation, deciding whether to use the weighted average cost of capital (WAAC) or a build-up method depends on the circumstances. Both methods are appropriate in valuing a business.
The WAAC represents the rate of return an investor expects that includes all investors, debt, and equity. It can be useful when the company has:
A Complex Capital Structure and you need to distinguish the different rates of returns for costs of equity and several types of debt.
Consideration of an acquisition and the buyer expects to pay off the debt and equity and refinance the entire debt and equity structure.
The objective is to value the equity of a business. The value of the Market Value of Invested Capital (value of debt and equity) is appropriate when a company is highly leveraged to understand the equity separate from the debt holders.
Capital Projects are situations where the WAAC can provide answers to what could be available to finance capital projects. This would be based on debt capacity.
The Build-Up Method is another way to estimate the cost of capital when valuing a privately held business. It is commonly used for small, privately held companies and involves “building up” various risk premiums of market rates of returns. The Build-Up Method is appropriate when.”
Small privately held companies where market data may not be readily available.
When there is no comparable market data to determine beta or market risk premiums.
Unique risk factors that can be accounted for in a more customized risk premium addition.
Early-stage companies that do not have stable capital structures.
Some common mistakes when calculating the WAAC and the Build Up Method
WAAC
Using the historical cost of debt instead of current market cost of debt. If a buyer is going to retire the debt and refinance, they will want to know what the current debt structure looks like.
Failing to account for the tax deductibility for the interest expense.
Using the average tax rate vs the marginal tax rate can lead to incorrect calculations.
Build-Up
Using a risk-free rate that does not match the time horizon, for instance, using a 20-year bond when the investment horizon is 10 years.
Using a general equity risk premium when more specific content is available.
Over reliance on subjective information without justification.
The choice of how a discount rate and/or capitalization rate is going to be calculated can be a difficult decision, but choosing an experienced business valuation analyst will go a long way.
1 -Cost of Capital, 5th Edition, Shannon Pratt, p 544
In the process of valuing a business, especially in divorce, the business owner often comments “but the business is not worth anything without me.” This could be true, however, in the context of a divorce, in equitable distribution states this statement is false for the following reasons.
First off, the business is valued on the premise of going concern. This is the assumption that the business is going to continue to operate into the near future and has no intention of liquidating or curtailing its business operations.
Secondly, there is the concept of value to the holder, especially for small businesses. Value to holder is the concept of the value of the business to the business owner (the holder). For example, if a sole proprietor earns $50,000 more than what he/she would be paid for a salary on the open market, that $50,000, using a multiple of five, would have approximately $250,000 in value to that sole proprietor. Even if there is no market for his/her business, it has value to him/her.
Both the previous situations enable the non-owner spouse to participate in an asset division of the privately held business.
There could be other factors involved.
Personal Goodwill vs. Practice/Enterprise Goodwill
In Massachusetts, Personal Goodwill is not a divisible asset in a divorce. It is important to distinguish between personal goodwill and practice or enterprise goodwill.
Personal goodwill is the value of the business that is attributable to the skills, reputation, relationships, and expertise of an individual, usually and owner, of the business. This portion of the value can not be transferred to another individual. The lack of transferability is the key concept. Business owners think that it is just because they have good relationships and expertise that they have personal goodwill. This is often not the case. A business valuation expert has good relationships and expertise but that does not mean other business valuation experts do not have the same skills and the relationships could be transitioned in an orderly way once they feel comfortable with the new expert.
A good example of personal goodwill is dental practice. Certain patients use the practice because of a particular dentist and would follow the dentist wherever he/she would go. Other patients go to the practice because it is convenient for them and is in a convenient location.
Practice/Enterprise Goodwill is the intangible portion of the value of a business. It is the total value less the value of the tangible assets (equipment, furniture, etc.). It is created through the business’s relationship with customers, location, brand recognition. This goodwill is tied to the business itself and not a particular individual.
There are many aspects of the division of assets that must be considered when a private business is involved. An experienced business valuation expert can not only navigate through these concepts but help explain them in a way to help the litigation process move forward.
There are approximately thirteen states that have legalized recreational use of cannabis. There are an additional twenty-two states which have legalized cannabis for medical use. Since cannabis is still illegal federally, the challenges of valuing these entities is challenging. Here are ten factors that affect the value of a cannabis entity.
Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code-Section 280E was introduced in the U.S. tax code in 1982 when a business engaged in illegal drug trafficking attempted to deduct ordinary business expenses on a tax return. Under Section 280E any business engaged in illegal substances can only deduct the cost of goods sold and not ordinary business expenses. This means that expenses such as rent, utilities, wages that are not related to cost of goods sold. This results in a significant impact on profit margin.
Branding-Companies that have a strong position in the market on their brand will have higher valuations.
Consistent earnings-Companies that have strong and consistent earnings and revenues will be less risky and result in higher valuation. Strong forecasts of consistent revenues and earnings for start up entities will result in higher values.
Innovation-Companies that can adjust to customer demands and continue to adapt to customer demand and preferences will generate consistent customer satisfaction and will result in higher values.
Compliance-The cannabis industry is highly regulated. The companies that adhere to these regulations and compliance will result in higher values.
Geographic presence-Like many other businesses being in areas where demand is high and it is socially acceptable will be valuable for the business.
Collaboration-There are vendors, suppliers and consultants who are specialized in the cannabis industry. Working with these specialists allows the cannabis business to be more efficient and results in higher profits and value to the company.
Production and supply management-For companies that manufacture cannabis products, efficient production strategy and supply chain management are important for cost efficiencies and higher profits and value.
Public Perception-Investor sentiment including favorable industry outlook, media coverage and public support go a long way to adding value to a cannabis business.
Team-having a strong management team with experience and a strong track goes a long way to the value of the business.
Though the cannabis industry is ever growing, many of the factors that increase value are concepts that have been around a long time. The tax consequences of Section 280E make many of these concepts even more crucial to establishing a strong valuable business.
Cannabis companies can be valued differently for a variety of reasons, similar to companies in any other industry. Here are some factors that can influence the valuation of cannabis companies:
Market Position and Branding: Companies with a strong market position and well-established brands tend to have higher valuations. Brand recognition, customer loyalty, and a positive reputation can contribute significantly to a company’s value.
Revenue and Earnings: Financial performance is a crucial factor in determining a company’s value. Cannabis companies that demonstrate consistent revenue growth, profitability, and strong financial management are often valued more highly.
Regulatory Environment: The regulatory landscape for cannabis varies widely across regions and countries. Companies operating in areas with favorable and stable regulations may be more highly valued due to reduced risks and obstacles.
Product Diversity and Innovation: Companies with a diverse product portfolio and a focus on innovation may be valued higher. The ability to adapt to changing consumer preferences and introduce new and unique products can set a company apart in the competitive cannabis market.
Geographic Presence: The geographic scope of operations can impact valuation. Companies with a widespread presence in markets with high demand for cannabis products may be valued more than those confined to smaller or less lucrative regions.
Production Capacity and Supply Chain Management: Companies with efficient production capabilities and a well-managed supply chain may be valued higher. This is especially important in the cannabis industry, where cultivation, processing, and distribution efficiency can significantly affect costs and profits.
Partnerships and Mergers: Strategic partnerships, collaborations, or mergers can influence a company’s valuation. Aligning with established industry players, securing distribution agreements, or engaging in mergers and acquisitions can boost a company’s perceived value.
Market Sentiment: Public perception and investor sentiment play a role in the valuation of cannabis companies. Positive media coverage, public support, and a favorable industry outlook can contribute to higher valuations.
Legal and Compliance Factors: Companies that adhere to legal and regulatory requirements are likely to be more valued. A strong commitment to compliance and risk management can reduce legal uncertainties and contribute to a positive valuation.
Management Team: The expertise and experience of a company’s management team can influence its valuation. A strong leadership team with a successful track record can instill confidence in investors and stakeholders.
It’s important to note that the cannabis industry is still evolving, and factors influencing valuations can change rapidly as the regulatory environment, consumer preferences, and market dynamics evolve. Additionally, investor perceptions and market trends can also impact how cannabis companies are valued.
Section 280E is a provision in the United States Internal Revenue Code that specifically deals with the taxation of income derived from the trafficking of controlled substances. It was added to the tax code in 1982 as a response to a case involving a drug dealer who attempted to deduct ordinary business expenses on their federal income tax return.
Under Section 280E, businesses engaged in the illegal trafficking of controlled substances, as defined by the Controlled Substances Act, are not allowed to deduct normal business expenses, except for the cost of goods sold (COGS), when calculating their federal taxable income. This means that such businesses cannot take deductions for expenses like rent, utilities, wages, and other typical operating costs that are deductible for legal businesses.
While the provision was initially intended for illegal drug trafficking, it has had a significant impact on state-legalized marijuana businesses in recent years. Even though marijuana is legal for recreational or medicinal use in some states, it remains illegal at the federal level. As a result, marijuana businesses are subject to Section 280E, facing limitations on the deductions they can claim, which can significantly impact their overall tax liability.
What does it mean to have a successful divorce? It almost seems like there is no such answer. Divorce can be one of the most traumatic experiences one can go through next to the death of a loved one. So maybe the question should not be successful but may be less traumatic.
The financial aspects of divorce can be a challenge because often time one spouse oversees the finances while the other one is often left in the dark. The most stressful things in our lives are things we do not know about, the unknown.
Here are ten things you can do from a financial standpoint to reduce that stress.
Consultant various specialists – Couples going through divorce usually rely on their attorneys for every aspect of their divorce. The fact of the matter is there are other professionals who can handle different aspects of your divorce more efficiently than your lawyer. This eliminates time your lawyer will spend on areas that are not their expertise. There are financial specialists, like Certified Divorce Financial Analyst (CDFA) who can help you with asset division, support calculations and filling out your financial statements. There are mental health specialists, real estate professionals, mortgage, specialists who are much more qualified and specialize in divorce. When you work with these professionals, your divorce becomes more efficient and that translates to less expensive.
Gather your financial information – It is important to gather your financial information and to continue to inventory your financial assets and liabilities. Gather tax returns for the past three to five years, investment account statements, mortgage and equity line statements. List them all out. If you find something that has an account number on it, then chances are you will need to document it.
Understand your finances – You may be the spouse that does not handle the finances. If this is the case, you need to start to learn your finances. You will have to do this post divorce anyways so now is the time to get educated. A financial expert can help you get started. Look for a CDFA who is familiar with the financial aspects of divorce.
Establish a budget – There are three things you need to do financially. Where are you today? Where are you the day your divorce is final? Where are you going to be financially? The future will look much different than where you are now. You need to set a budget to determine where you will be post-divorce.
Negotiate fairly – This is easier said than done but think about the end goal in mind. I never heard anyone post-divorce say they got everything they wanted. You must decide what is important to you in the end, especially if you have kids because you will still be co-parents for the rest of your lives. I suggest reading attorney David Kellem’s article about the price of peace: https://www.kellemlawgroup.com/blog/2018/march/david-s-divorce-dictionary-price-of-peace/
Protect your Credit – Couples need to begin to close or change accounts that are help jointly. Credit cards, lines of credit and other accounts that are held joint need to be changed. If you are on an account that is held joint, and payments are not made it will also negatively affect your credit.
Consider tax implications – Not all assets are treated equally. It is important to know what the tax effects on assets are when dividing assets. Some assets have a tax consequence while others do not. This will mean if you think you’re getting an even split you may not be after taxes are paid. Consult a CDFA for assistance.
Update legal documents – This includes changing beneficiaries on life insurance, annuities and even emergency contacts. Consult your attorney on what legal documents need to be updated.
Take of yourself – Finances can be complicated and overwhelming. It is important to take care of yourself as much as possible, including eating right, exercising and seeking therapy or therapy groups. Some people find that going through divorce can be a fresh start and a reason to finally put themselves first.
Follow Court Orders – This sounds obvious, but some people think that they can decide what belongs on their financial statements and leave out assets or income that may appear not necessarily. Let your attorney advocate for you and the best strategy is to be upfront about everything. Credibility is important in this process.
Divorce can be stressful. Build a team of professionals that can help you get through it efficiently. Get yourself educated by attending webinars and workshops. A good place to look for some throughout the country is Vesta Divorce: https://vestadivorce.com/.
Host: David Consigli, CPA/ABV, CDFA, Partner and Lead, FAZ CPAs Business Valuation Practice
Guest(s): Brian Burns CPA/ABV/CFF, Partner and lead, FORVIS LLP Forensics and Valuation practice Natalya Abdrasilova, CPA/ABV, MAFF, CVA, Director of Valuation & Litigation Services, BDM, PC
In this episode, David, Natalya, and Brian discuss the current trends and challenges in business valuation and gift and estate tax including the importance of staying up to date on the current and potential changes in the gift and estate tax landscape.
This podcast episode is part of the extensive resource library available from the AICPA’s Forensic and Valuation Services Section, the premier provider of guidance, tools, and advocacy for professionals who specialize in providing forensics, valuation, litigation, and fraud services.
The AICPA offers resources and guidance to practitioners that work in the business valuation of estate and gift taxation such as the toolkit landing page, practice aids, and the case law listing.
The divorce process can be stressful. People will often make mistakes when it comes to financial matters that can have lifetime consequences in the divorce process. We outline the top ten financial mistakes people make during a divorce.
Not educating themselves on the finances – sometimes one spouse manages all the finances, and the other spouse is completely in the dark. This becomes problematic and stressful for the non-financial spouse. It is imperative that the spouse not managing the finances educates themselves on financial matters. This is often done by hiring a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst who can help prepare income and expense analysis before, during, and after the pending divorce.
Treating all assets the same – The fact of the matter is that not all assets are the same. Some assets have tax consequences. For example, if you split all your assets 50/50 and some have tax consequences, then you will not get a 50/50 split. It is important to consult a tax advisor when splitting assets.
Not updating financial documents – All your financial documents need to be updated, including beneficiaries on life insurance policies, annuities, and other financial documents. Make sure these designations reflect your post-divorce wishes.
Not accurately accounting for expenses – Life after divorce may look much different than before. People often underestimate their operating expenses going forward and therefore may have trouble meeting them. There will be many changes and people often overlook housing and healthcare expenses and other lifestyle changes.
Getting rid of joint debt – Make you consolidate and get rid of any joint debt. If payments are made accidentally or on purpose, this could cause credit problems down the road. Clear planning and making sure these debts are paid is crucial to reflect post-divorce credit worthiness.
Not having assets appraised – Some couples have an interest in business, expensive artwork or jewelry and never have it appraised. Especially small businesses. There are professionals who value these items and are experts in their field.
Not searching for hidden assets – spouses sometimes have trusts, overseas accounts, or transfer assets to family and/or friends. Forensic accountants can assist in finding these hidden assets.
Not properly allocating marital assets – When couples divorce, they go from being one household to two households. The asset split much be fair to each spouse in both the terms of cash flow today and retirement assets tomorrow. Having too much of one or the other can cause financial hardship.
Ignoring credit – establishing individual credit is important, especially after divorce, if you plan to buy a house or a car and have no credit
Not using professionals – There are numerous financial professionals who can assist through the maze of financial implications in a divorce. These professionals can be hired by either side or can be hired by both couples as a joint expert. The money spent on peace of mind is worth it.
Each divorce is unique as is each financial situation. Divorce is a financial break up also, not planning and not seeking financial advice from an expert can be a financial disaster. Financial decisions should not be made on emotion but should be well thought out with the assistance of a financial and tax expert.
Host: David Consigli, CPA/ABV, CDFA, Partner and Lead, FAZ CPAs Business Valuation Practice
Guest(s): Natalya Abdrasilova, CPA/ABV, MAFF, CVA, Director of Valuation & Litigation Services, BDM, PC
Natalya and Dave discuss several recent valuation cases that they presented at the 2023 AICPA FVS conference, including:
Whether PPP funds should be included in a marital dissolution valuation
A charitable stock donation where the appraisal was rejected because the investment banker doing it lacked proper credentials
A divorce case where the court relied on a minority interest sale price rather than the husband’s expert, and
The Biltmore Estate case where the IRS lost arguing for an asset approach rather than an income approach
Dave and Natalya would like to hear from you about interesting cases, especially Canadian ones. Please share your thoughts at infoFVS@aicpa-cima.com and put in the subject: podcast ep 79.
For further exploration on this topic: If you’re using a podcast app that does not hyperlink to the resources, please visit https://fvssection.libsyn.com/fvs to access the show notes with direct links.
This podcast episode is part of the extensive resource library available from the AICPA’s Forensic and Valuation Services Section, the premier provider of guidance, tools, and advocacy for professionals who specialize in providing forensics, valuation, litigation, and fraud services. If you’re not already a member, visit us online and consider joining this active community of your FVS peers. You’ll get free CPE and access to rich technical content.
Don’t Miss an Episode
Follow us wherever you get your podcasts and leave us a review using this link or copy and paste this URL into your browser https://forms.office.com/r/4cjNd6m1TJ so we can continue bringing valuable and relevant content to you. Any other issues can be sent to podcast@aicpa-cima.com
Information on Credentials
Our FVS credential programs allow AICPA members to demonstrate competence and confidence in providing forensic and valuation services to their clients.
A Buy/Sell Agreement, also called a business pre-nuptial agreement, or a business will, is a legal document that is used as the mechanism governing business owners upon the exit of an owner. Buy-Sell Agreements create the necessary road map to make these exits less stressful by minimizing disruptions, and avoiding conflict.
The price to be paid for an exiting owner’s interest is the single most contended point during a transition of ownership. Owners can avoid future discrepancies in interpretation among owners by proactively addressing the following valuation-related issues in their Buy-Sell Agreement:
Update your business valuation regularly.
Your company’s value changes over time, so it is recommended that the business valuation be updated every two to three years. In the event that an unplanned triggered event happens, your family, remaining shareholders and any successors will have a clear understanding of the fair value of the business value.
Engage one appraiser.
Unplanned exits sometimes require multiple appraisers—one to represent each shareholder’s interest. If these two appraisers are not within a certain percentage, then a third appraiser may need to be hired. Obviously, this can become very costly. Business owners who plan in advance of a triggered event are able to hire one appraiser who serves as a trusted advisor, consulting with the shareholders on an ongoing basis.
Pass on using a formula method to value.
Using a formula method may certainly cut costs and seem easy, but again, the value of a business changes over time. The formula method values the business at a point in time, and may materially misprice the value of the interest to be transferred in the future. In addition, formulas and rules of thumb are not accepted valuation methods when subjected to IRS scrutiny. We recommend that your Buy-Sell Agreement calls for a formal, updated appraisal that reflects the true economic value of the interest to be transferred.
Properly fund your life insurance.
In the event of an untimely death, life insurance proceeds are often used for the buyout of the shareholder’s heirs and to pay any estate taxes due. A proper business valuation will help ensure there is enough life insurance proceeds to protect your family and fund these expenditures.
Specify the right standard of value.
There is not one standard of value recommended over another, because one-size does not fit all when it comes to ensuring that the agreement adequately addresses the owners’ objectives and the potential scenarios that could occur. The standard of value you choose should take into consideration the mutual intentions of all parties involved, estate tax implications, state laws, and funding of life insurance. The right standard of value is one where all interest holders are in agreement.
The reality is that every business owner is going to leave at some point. There are planned exits, such as pursuing other business opportunities, retirement, and sometimes just burnout. There are unplanned exits, such as death, disability, or shareholder disputes. Buy-Sell Agreements, coupled with a current, professional valuation are critical components which can alleviate some of the stress that comes with succession planning.
There are many moving parts in a buy/sell agreement. They need to be reviewed and updated often. There are many difficult issues that need to be addressed. One of the decisions the owners need to make is what standard of value to use in the business valuation. It is important for the shareholders to understand each standard in order to select the standard that best fits their needs.
It is imperative that standard of value language exists in the buy/sell agreement otherwise it will be difficult to value the Company at all. Some definitions of standard of values are as follows:
FAIR MARKET VALUE
Fair market value may be the most used standard of value but it may also be the most misunderstood. People think of fair market value similar to the term used in real estate. It will also depend on whose definition of fair market value you use.
For example, under Revenue Ruling 59-60 the definition is “The price for which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller when the former is not under the compulsion to buy and the latter is not under the compulsion to sell, both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.”¹
It is also defined in the Glossary of the Business Valuation Standards of the American Society of Appraisers as, “The price, expressed in cash equivalents, at which property would exchange hands between a hypothetical willing and able buyer and a hypothetical willing and able seller, acting at arm’s length in an open and unrestricted market, when neither is under compulsion to buy or sell and when both have reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts.”
The parties are willing and able financially. They are assumed to have independent interests and act on their own behalf. It is an arm’s length transaction. There are eight factors to consider in a fair market valuation they are:
The nature of the business and history of the enterprise.
The economic outlook and general outlook of the industry.
The book value of the stock and the financial condition of the business.
The earning capacity of the company.
The dividend paying capacity.
Whether or not the company has goodwill or other intangible value.
Sales of the stock and the size of the block sold.
The market price of stocks for corporations that are engaged in the same or a similar line of business and that have their stock traded in a free and open market, either on an exchange or over-the-counter.
¹ In addition that hypothetical buyer and seller are assumed to be able, as well as willing to trade and to be well-informed about the property and concerning the market for such property.
FAIR VALUE
The term fair value is defined by state law and varies from state to state. Most states use the term equitable distribution, which usually mean that the value is prior to taken any minority, key-man or marketability discounts. Fair Value can vary from state to state so therefore it can be confusing to use this standard of value in a buy/sell agreement. In Massachusetts fair value is defined as______________Fair value is also used in financial reporting under ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820 defines fair value for financial purposes under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. There is a high likelihood of confusion with this standard of value.
INVESTMENT VALUE
Investment value is the value that an investment has to one particular buyer. This standard of value contains a “synergy value” between the buyer and the seller. The buyer may be willing to pay more for a business that has a synergy with the buyer. The challenge with investment value is you would need to know who the buyer is. That would be difficult if not impossible to predict.
Fair market value is the standard of value of choice. What needs to be emphasized is that the definition should be stated in the agreement so there is no confusion. Buy/sell agreements should be reviewed to make sure that there are not any valuation standards of value that do not exist.
FAZ Forensics is rated 4.95 out of 5.0 stars based on 21 review(s).
---
FAZ Forensics did a full review and evaluation of my business and I was very happy with the level of detail and expertise.
- Chris Schmidt
---
Christian has, along with his good nature and thoughtful regard, been exceedingly helpful with sorting out the complexities of our case.
We could not be more pleased with our exchange.
Thomas and Hema Easley
- Thomas Easley
---
Christian was patient and easy to understand. clear, concise and thorough. he spoke “plain” English and was respectful. he did not “rush” and he responded to every question i had, in a timely manner. no matter how “dumb” it may have seemed. for example, i received some paperwork by mail and i did not understand it. i emailed him about it and he cleared it up that day. thats great customer service!
- Joong Park
---
Really good, very knowledgeable and communicated with us every step of the way.
- Haartz Corporation/Tom Daigneault
---
FAZ has a great team doing terrific work for our clients.
- Jim Towne
---
Exceptional work produced.
- Matt Smith
---
Thanks!
- Arrow Bank
---
FAZ was very professional, knowledgeable and very fair priced. The work performed was prompt, accurate and reliable. I would absolutely hire them again if in need for additional accounting work.
- Arrow Financial Corporation
---
Excellent to work with. Professional and personable.
- Cambridge Central School District
---
Awesome team! They were a pleasure to work with. I would definitely recommend.
- Cambridge Central School District
---
FAZ was extremely thorough and professional in doing our business valuation. We are very pleased with the results
- Anne Choppy
---
Steve and GeNet were great at the valuation we needed. Very satisfied.
Thanks,Vince and Anne
- Vincent M. Choppy
---
Perfect
- Zalazar anelardo
---
Gen'et and Paul were extremely responsive to our needs. They listened and responded to any concerns that we had. I would highly recommend them for any forensic engagement needs.
- Jennifer Mulligan
---
Thank-you for asking. Our experience was excellent. The people at FAZ showed a depth of knowledge and experience that was very helpful with the undertaking before us. Well done.
- Guy Tombs
---
The CPAs and staff at FAZ are truly amazing. They explain their process very well and always answered my questions right away. I highly recommend them for all your forensic accounting and evaluation services.
- Ashley Hart
---
Excellent and responsible.
- Peter Lee
---
Steve Ferraro did an excellent job and worked tirelessly as our expert forensic accountant witness. Based on Steve's hard work, the jury awarded every penny that Steve showed our client to be entitled to and completely rejected the conclusions of the opposing side's expert.
- Dave Paliotti
---
Great firm!
- John Harwick
---
The people at FAZ are amazing. They are true professionals. The staff is knowledgeable & kind. You feel like you matter. Anytime I have questions they take the time to go through everything in detail so I completely understand everything. I would definitely recommend FAZ.