Skip to main content

Author: Sophia Hourihan

Rent Rolls

Why Rent Rolls Aren’t Enough to Support a Loss of Rents Claim

Rent Rolls

When a property owner experiences a loss — fire, water damage, hurricane, or another covered event — the first instinct is often to hand over the rent roll to the carrier or adjuster as the basis for a Loss of Rents claim. But rent rolls tell only part of the story. A rent roll shows who is supposed to pay rent; a Loss of Rents calculation requires proof of what rent was actually lost. Those two things are not the same.

Rent rolls are forward-looking. They list tenants, lease terms, and the rent the landlord expects to collect. However, they do not reveal:

  • Whether tenants were current on payments prior to the loss,
  • Whether rent stopped due to the loss or because the tenant was already delinquent, or
  • Whether vacancies were caused by — and covered by — the incident.

Relying solely on rent rolls can inflate a claim and create unnecessary disputes and delays.

Understanding tenant movement and lease behavior is critical. Some tenants may move out because the unit was offline due to the loss; others may leave simply to avoid the disruption, or they may be relocated to another unit. Some tenants receive concessions or discounted rent instead of moving out. Each scenario affects the loss value differently.

Profit and loss statements also play a key role. “Other income” categories — such as laundry, parking, or pet fees — often decrease alongside rent when tenants move out, and those reductions need to be captured in the loss.

Lease cycles must also be considered. In college markets, for example, leasing may only occur once a year on September 1. If damage prevents leasing during that period, the landlord may lose an entire lease cycle even if the property is repaired by spring. Missing the lease inception date can create significant loss that rent rolls alone won’t reveal.

To build a defensible Loss of Rents claim, additional documentation is needed:

  • Tenant ledgers show actual payment history and whether the tenant was current.
  • Lease agreements confirm contracted rent and intended move-out dates.
  • Vacancy records identify whether tenants could have been relocated to other units (for example, if the building had sufficient capacity).
  • Communication records support whether concessions or abatements were tied to the loss.

Loss of Rents calculations are based on actual economic loss — not projected income. Carriers and opposing experts will focus on whether the loss event caused the vacancy, and whether rent was collectible before the loss occurred. Rent rolls are a necessary starting point, but without documentation that verifies actual lost cash flow, they are not evidence.

A defensible Loss of Rents claim ties lease terms → tenant payment history → actual lost income. When that narrative is supported with proper documentation, claims are resolved faster and with fewer disputes.

craftsman working on furniture

Navigating a Complex Business Interruption Loss

craftsman working on furniture

In this case, our client represented an Insured who owned a custom handmade furniture business based in New England. Following a devastating fire that destroyed their primary storefront and workshop, the business was forced to operate out of a temporary pop-up location with significantly less capacity. The client filed a business interruption claim, but due to the nature of their operations and their manual record keeping, it was challenging to evaluate the loss in a traditional manner.

To begin, FAZ worked closely with the Insured to understand the operational structure of the business. The company did not use a modern or automated accounting system and instead maintained handwritten logs for customer orders, payment plans, and furniture build schedules. Because furniture was often built to order with varying production timelines, and deposits were collected in stages, the company’s cash-basis profit and loss statements did not clearly reflect the actual impact of the fire on revenue and profitability.

FAZ conducted a detailed analysis of the business’s incoming orders, production timelines, and customer deposit patterns. This required extensive collaboration with the client to obtain daily order records and reconcile them with payment histories and manual schedules. At the same time, FAZ evaluated the extra expenses incurred to operate the pop-up store and determined whether these expenses helped mitigate the overall business income loss.

Throughout the process, FAZ engaged in multiple rounds of discussions with the opposing forensic accountant to address the complexities of the claim and provide clarity on the methodologies used. Despite the lack of standardized data and the need for extensive manual reconciliation, FAZ was able to quantify the loss and present a thorough, supportable claim.

In this case, FAZ’s forensic analysis and close collaboration with the client helped overcome substantial documentation challenges and led to a finalized business interruption claim that was submitted to the Insurance company for resolution.

Make Up Revenue

Make-Up Revenues

Understanding Make-Up Revenues in Business Interruption Claims

When a business experiences a loss event, such as a fire, flood, natural disaster, or other covered event, it may result in lost income during the period of restoration. However, one important factor in accurately calculating business interruption (BI) losses is recognizing the impact of make-up revenues. These revenues, earned after the loss period, can sometimes offset lost income and significantly influence the final loss calculation.

What Are Make-Up Revenues?

Make-up revenues refer to sales or earnings that a business “makes-up” after resuming operations following the loss period. These revenues occur when customers defer purchases or the company increases capacity after the loss period to recover lost business. For example, if a company operates at 100% capacity under normal conditions, they may increase production to 150% after the loss period to compensate for lost production. This post-loss increase needs to be considered and netted against the lost production during the loss period.

Industry-Specific Considerations

The impact of make-up revenues varies across industries. Some businesses, like professional services firms, can recover lost work by reallocating resources or increasing billable hours. Additionally, businesses with multiple locations may increase volume in another location while being down at the other location. Retail businesses, on the other hand, may find it harder to recover lost foot traffic, especially if customers have turned to competitors during the downtime. Similarly, industries with perishable goods or seating capacities, such as restaurants, may have no opportunity to make up for lost sales.

Key Factors in Evaluating Make-Up Revenues

When assessing make-up revenues, forensic accountants consider several factors:

  • Timing: The period in which the revenues are earned is another crucial consideration. It is important to recognize if the company operates on a cash or accrual basis. Make-up revenues may be harder to detect if the company operates at a cash basis. For example, if a company increases its services immediately after the loss, but does not recognize those revenues until cash is received months later, the make-up revenues may be overlooked.
  • Location Logistics: Businesses that have multiple locations may see make-up revenue during the loss period at an alternate location. For instance, if the company has two locations within a 10-mile radius, it is likely that customers will just go to the unaffected location. Because of this, it is important to request the companies profit and loss statements from all locations so that you can evaluate if make-up occurred.
  • Capacity Constraints: Some businesses, like manufacturers, may be able to increase production post-loss, while others, such as event-based businesses, may have no means to recover lost revenue. For example, manufacturing facilities may have their workers work extra shifts once the facility is back up and running, so that they make up their lost production quicker than they would if they were operating at a normal speed. The increased production may reduce lost income if they are able to fulfill orders at a normal pace.
  • Customer Behavior: If customers simply delay purchases until after the business reopens, those revenues should be considered when assessing net losses. This is an important consideration in medical practices. For instance, if a dentist or doctor experiences a short-term disruption, patients are unlikely to switch providers. Instead, they will typically wait until their provider resumes operations.
  • Competitive Impact: If a business loses customers permanently to competitors, future sales may not offset the loss, even if revenues temporarily increase. Competitive impact is important to recognize in specialized businesses. If a company offers a unique product that is difficult to find elsewhere, it is more likely to recover lost sales after the disruption. However, if the business lacks specialization and experiences a longer loss period, customers are more likely to seek alternatives, reducing the potential for make-up revenue.
Why It Matters

Properly accounting for make-up revenues ensures that business interruption claims are fair and accurately represent true financial losses. Overlooking make-up revenues may lead to overstated claims, while failing to identify lost opportunities can result in undervaluation.

Conclusion

Understanding make-up revenues is essential in BI loss calculations. Forensic accountants play a key role in this process by applying detailed analyses to ensure accurate and supportable loss calculations. If your business is navigating a BI claim and needs assistance, consulting with an experienced forensic accountant can help clarify these critical issues and support a well-founded claim.

Read Our Reviews

FAZ Forensics is rated 4.95 out of 5.0 stars based on 21 review(s).

---

FAZ Forensics did a full review and evaluation of my business and I was very happy with the level of detail and expertise.

- Chris Schmidt

---

Christian has, along with his good nature and thoughtful regard, been exceedingly helpful with sorting out the complexities of our case. We could not be more pleased with our exchange. Thomas and Hema Easley

- Thomas Easley

---

Christian was patient and easy to understand. clear, concise and thorough. he spoke “plain” English and was respectful. he did not “rush” and he responded to every question i had, in a timely manner. no matter how “dumb” it may have seemed. for example, i received some paperwork by mail and i did not understand it. i emailed him about it and he cleared it up that day. thats great customer service!

- Joong Park

---

Really good, very knowledgeable and communicated with us every step of the way.

- Haartz Corporation/Tom Daigneault

---

FAZ has a great team doing terrific work for our clients.

- Jim Towne

---

Exceptional work produced.

- Matt Smith

---

Thanks!

- Arrow Bank

---

FAZ was very professional, knowledgeable and very fair priced. The work performed was prompt, accurate and reliable. I would absolutely hire them again if in need for additional accounting work.

- Arrow Financial Corporation

---

Excellent to work with. Professional and personable.

- Cambridge Central School District

---

Awesome team! They were a pleasure to work with. I would definitely recommend.

- Cambridge Central School District

---

FAZ was extremely thorough and professional in doing our business valuation. We are very pleased with the results

- Anne Choppy

---

Steve and GeNet were great at the valuation we needed. Very satisfied. Thanks,Vince and Anne

- Vincent M. Choppy

---

Perfect

- Zalazar anelardo

---

Gen'et and Paul were extremely responsive to our needs. They listened and responded to any concerns that we had. I would highly recommend them for any forensic engagement needs.

- Jennifer Mulligan

---

Thank-you for asking. Our experience was excellent. The people at FAZ showed a depth of knowledge and experience that was very helpful with the undertaking before us. Well done.

- Guy Tombs

---

The CPAs and staff at FAZ are truly amazing. They explain their process very well and always answered my questions right away. I highly recommend them for all your forensic accounting and evaluation services.

- Ashley Hart

---

Excellent and responsible.

- Peter Lee

---

Steve Ferraro did an excellent job and worked tirelessly as our expert forensic accountant witness. Based on Steve's hard work, the jury awarded every penny that Steve showed our client to be entitled to and completely rejected the conclusions of the opposing side's expert.

- Dave Paliotti

---

Great firm!

- John Harwick

---

The people at FAZ are amazing. They are true professionals. The staff is knowledgeable & kind. You feel like you matter. Anytime I have questions they take the time to go through everything in detail so I completely understand everything. I would definitely recommend FAZ.

- Dan Dagostino