Skip to main content

Conclusion of Value vs. Calculation of Value: Which Service Offering is Right for Me?

In business valuation, there are two levels of service offerings: a conclusion of value and a calculation of value. In this article, I will explain the differences between these two service offerings and hopefully help you better understand which is the best service offering for your needs.

Per the AICPA’s VS Section 100 Statements on Standards for Valuation Services (“SSVS”) a conclusion of value has been performed when: 

“(1) the engagement calls for the valuation analyst to estimate the value of a subject interest and (2) the valuation analyst estimates the value and is free to apply the valuation approaches and methods he or she deems appropriate in the circumstances.”

In comparison, the SSVS states a calculation of value has been performed when: 

(1) the valuation analyst and the client agree on the valuation approaches and methods the valuation analyst will use and the extent of procedures the valuation analyst will perform in the process of calculating the value of a subject interest (these procedures will be more limited than those of a valuation engagement.) and (2) the valuation analyst calculates the value in compliance with the agreement

Based on these definitions, the main difference between a conclusion of value and a calculation of value lies in the approaches and methods utilized by the valuation expert in determining value. In a conclusion of value engagement, the valuation expert uses their professional judgement in determining the methods and approaches to use in their analysis. However, all approaches and methods must be considered in the expert’s analysis. In a calculation of value engagement, the approaches and methods to be used by the valuation expert in determining value are agreed upon between the expert and the client prior to the start of the engagement. This difference signifies that a conclusion of value engagement is usually more intensive and costly than a calculation of value engagement. 

So, which service offering is right for you? Well, this depends on your intended use of the valuation. If the valuation will be used for court or to attach to a gift or estate tax return being sent to the IRS, you will need a conclusion of value engagement. This is because a conclusion of value is more conclusive than a calculation of value engagement and thus, is necessary for use in court or to send to the IRS. However, there are several scenarios where a calculation of value engagement may be a better and less expensive option than a conclusion of value engagement. I have listed a few of these scenarios below:

  • Upper-level management or a business owner is looking to determine the value of their business for management strategy, growth planning, exit planning, or stock option plan introduction purposes
  • A buyer interested in acquiring a business that is looking for a value to negotiate a purchase price or help them better understand the valuation process
  • A shareholder buy-out that has been agreed between all parties that a conclusion of value is unnecessary
  • An attorney that needs consulting regarding a case or requires just a preliminary value to help them better strategize for their case and better serve their clients. As we will note below, this calculation of value could be upgraded to a conclusion of value if necessary

In addition to our conclusion of value service offerings at FAZ, we have developed a Strategic Business Valuation (“SBV”) that leads to a calculation of value and is designed to offer our clients the best value for your money for those that only require a calculation of value engagement. Another perk of the SBV is that it can be easily upgraded to a conclusion of value engagement if required without having to redo any of the work completed in the calculation of value engagement. 

For those interested in additional information regarding FAZ’s valuation services please reach out to either Stephen Ferraro at 518-288-2136 or David Consigli at 508-330-4513.  


Noah Van Zandt

Noah Van Zandt is currently a Supervisor with FAZ Forensics. Noah works with cases pertaining to business valuations, fraud and forensic analysis, and claims for lost earnings.

Read Our Reviews

FAZ Forensics is rated 4.95 out of 5.0 stars based on 21 review(s).

---

FAZ Forensics did a full review and evaluation of my business and I was very happy with the level of detail and expertise.

- Chris Schmidt

---

Christian has, along with his good nature and thoughtful regard, been exceedingly helpful with sorting out the complexities of our case. We could not be more pleased with our exchange. Thomas and Hema Easley

- Thomas Easley

---

Christian was patient and easy to understand. clear, concise and thorough. he spoke “plain” English and was respectful. he did not “rush” and he responded to every question i had, in a timely manner. no matter how “dumb” it may have seemed. for example, i received some paperwork by mail and i did not understand it. i emailed him about it and he cleared it up that day. thats great customer service!

- Joong Park

---

Really good, very knowledgeable and communicated with us every step of the way.

- Haartz Corporation/Tom Daigneault

---

FAZ has a great team doing terrific work for our clients.

- Jim Towne

---

Exceptional work produced.

- Matt Smith

---

Thanks!

- Arrow Bank

---

FAZ was very professional, knowledgeable and very fair priced. The work performed was prompt, accurate and reliable. I would absolutely hire them again if in need for additional accounting work.

- Arrow Financial Corporation

---

Excellent to work with. Professional and personable.

- Cambridge Central School District

---

Awesome team! They were a pleasure to work with. I would definitely recommend.

- Cambridge Central School District

---

FAZ was extremely thorough and professional in doing our business valuation. We are very pleased with the results

- Anne Choppy

---

Steve and GeNet were great at the valuation we needed. Very satisfied. Thanks,Vince and Anne

- Vincent M. Choppy

---

Perfect

- Zalazar anelardo

---

Gen'et and Paul were extremely responsive to our needs. They listened and responded to any concerns that we had. I would highly recommend them for any forensic engagement needs.

- Jennifer Mulligan

---

Thank-you for asking. Our experience was excellent. The people at FAZ showed a depth of knowledge and experience that was very helpful with the undertaking before us. Well done.

- Guy Tombs

---

The CPAs and staff at FAZ are truly amazing. They explain their process very well and always answered my questions right away. I highly recommend them for all your forensic accounting and evaluation services.

- Ashley Hart

---

Excellent and responsible.

- Peter Lee

---

Steve Ferraro did an excellent job and worked tirelessly as our expert forensic accountant witness. Based on Steve's hard work, the jury awarded every penny that Steve showed our client to be entitled to and completely rejected the conclusions of the opposing side's expert.

- Dave Paliotti

---

Great firm!

- John Harwick

---

The people at FAZ are amazing. They are true professionals. The staff is knowledgeable & kind. You feel like you matter. Anytime I have questions they take the time to go through everything in detail so I completely understand everything. I would definitely recommend FAZ.

- Dan Dagostino